How Many Registered Voters In "Latrobe" Pa Voted In The 2016 Presidential Election
Since 1964, the U.Southward. Census Bureau has fielded the Voting and Registration Supplement to the Current Population Survey every ii years. Today, the Census Agency released a series of tabulations and data products aslope a public use data file for the November 2016 presidential election.
In improver to the requirement that individuals be at least 18 years onetime, voters in national elections must also be U.South. citizens. Although the Demography Agency has collected voting and registration data since 1964, the Current Population Survey has gathered citizenship data since 1978. Figure 1 presents voting rates for the denizen voting-historic period population for each presidential election since 1980. In 2016, 61.4 percent of the citizen voting-age population reported voting, a number not statistically dissimilar from the 61.8 pct who reported voting in 2012.
Voting rates take historically varied by race and Hispanic origin (Figure 2). In 2012, voting rates for non-Hispanic blacks (66.6 percent) were higher than non-Hispanic whites (64.i pct) for the first time in this series. In 2016, turnout increased to 65.3 percent for non-Hispanic whites, simply decreased to 59.half-dozen percent for non-Hispanic blacks.
For the most part, from 1980 to 2012, the share of reported voters who were non-Hispanic white decreased from ane presidential election bike to the next (Effigy 3).one In 1980, 87.6 per centum of reported voters were non-Hispanic white, but by 2012, this number decreased to 73.vii pct. Over this same flow, the distribution of voters who reported being either non-white or Hispanic increased in nigh elections.2 Even so, in 2016, for only the second time in this series, the percentage of voters who were non-Hispanic white (73.3) was not statistically unlike from the previous presidential election, pregnant that the consistently observed year-to-year decrease did not occur in this virtually recent bicycle. Additionally, 2016 was only the 2d election in this series where the share of not-Hispanic black voters decreased, from 12.nine percentage in 2012 to eleven.9 percent in 2016.3
Voting rates take also historically varied according to age, with older Americans by and large voting at higher rates than younger Americans (Effigy 4). In 2016, this was in one case again the case, as citizens 65 years and older reported college turnout (seventy.nine percent) than 45- to 64-year-olds (66.6 percent), xxx- to 44-year-olds (58.7 percent) and xviii- to 29-year-olds (46.1 per centum). All the same, in 2016, young voters ages eighteen to 29 were the only age group to study increased turnout compared to 2012, with a reported turnout increase of 1.i percent. All older historic period groups either reported small still statistically significant turnout decreases (45- to 64-year-olds and those age 65 and older) or turnout rates not statistically different from 2012 (thirty- to 44-year-olds).
When analyzed together, reported turnout by age, race and Hispanic origin differed in 2016 likewise. In comparison to 2012, younger non-Hispanic whites between the ages of 18 to 29 and between the ages of thirty to 44 reported higher turnout in 2016, while voting rates for the ii oldest groups of non-Hispanic whites were not statistically different (Figure 5). Meanwhile, for non-Hispanic blacks, turnout rates decreased in 2016 for every age group. For other race not-Hispanics and Hispanics of whatsoever race, voting rates betwixt 2012 and 2016 were not statistically dissimilar for any historic period groups.
In any given presidential election, the number of reported voters typically increases relative to the previous presidential election, largely equally a production of increases in the size of the citizen voting-historic period population. Table 1 shows changes in both the number of reported voters and the citizen voting-historic period population betwixt 2012 and 2016. Overall, in 2016, there were about 4.6 1000000 more reported voters than in 2012. A majority of these additional voters (3.7 one thousand thousand) were 65 years and older. Remember, despite these additional reported voters, the overall voting rate was not statistically dissimilar between the ii elections.
When analyzed alongside race and Hispanic origin, in 2016 a large portion of the additional reported voters (two.8 million) were non-Hispanic whites who were also 65 years of historic period and older.
In improver to race, Hispanic origin and age, reported voting rates varied according to a diverseness of other social, demographic and economic factors every bit well. Readers are invited to explore the Census Bureau's additional voting and registration resources for the 2016 election and beyond.
Voting estimates from the Current Population Survey and other sample surveys have historically differed from those based on administrative data, such as the official results reported past each state and disseminated collectively by the Clerk of U.S. House of Representatives and the Federal Election Commission. In general, voting rates from the sample surveys such as the Current Population Survey are higher than official results. Potential explanations for this divergence include detail nonresponse, vote misreporting, problems with retention or knowledge of others' voting beliefs, and methodological issues related to question diction and survey assistants. Despite these issues, the Demography Agency'south Nov supplement to the Current Population Survey remains the most comprehensive data source available for examining the social and demographic composition of the electorate in federal elections, particularly when examining wide historical trends for subpopulations.
one Between 1988 and 1992, the share of voters who were non-Hispanic white were not statistically different.
2 Between 1988 and 1992, the share of voters who were either other race non-Hispanic or Hispanic of any race were non statistically different. Betwixt 1996 and 2000, the share of voters who were other race non-Hispanic were not statistically different. Additionally, betwixt 1984 and 1988, and 1988 and 1992, the share of voters who were non-Hispanic black were not statistically different.
3 Between 2000 and 2004, the share of voters who were blackness also decreased.
For More Information
Source: https://www.census.gov/newsroom/blogs/random-samplings/2017/05/voting_in_america.html
Posted by: juarezalloss.blogspot.com
0 Response to "How Many Registered Voters In "Latrobe" Pa Voted In The 2016 Presidential Election"
Post a Comment